Dan Carpenter
2014-10-21 08:28:12 UTC
The ->ip_set_list[] array is initialized in ip_set_net_init() and it
has ->ip_set_max elements so this check should be >= instead of >
otherwise we are off by one.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <***@oracle.com>
---
I am not very familiar with this code, so please review cautiously.
This is an old bug which should go to -stable.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
index 912e5a0..86f9d76 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ ip_set_nfnl_get_byindex(struct net *net, ip_set_id_t index)
struct ip_set *set;
struct ip_set_net *inst = ip_set_pernet(net);
- if (index > inst->ip_set_max)
+ if (index >= inst->ip_set_max)
return IPSET_INVALID_ID;
nfnl_lock(NFNL_SUBSYS_IPSET);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to ***@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
has ->ip_set_max elements so this check should be >= instead of >
otherwise we are off by one.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <***@oracle.com>
---
I am not very familiar with this code, so please review cautiously.
This is an old bug which should go to -stable.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
index 912e5a0..86f9d76 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ ip_set_nfnl_get_byindex(struct net *net, ip_set_id_t index)
struct ip_set *set;
struct ip_set_net *inst = ip_set_pernet(net);
- if (index > inst->ip_set_max)
+ if (index >= inst->ip_set_max)
return IPSET_INVALID_ID;
nfnl_lock(NFNL_SUBSYS_IPSET);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to ***@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html